GoodFellas - Ending Explained

The plot of GoodFellas culminates in a frantic, paranoia-fueled final act that details Henry Hill's downfall. After the massive Lufthansa heist, Jimmy Conway becomes consumed with fear of being caught and begins systematically murdering everyone involved in the robbery to eliminate any potential witnesses. This includes close associates, revealing the complete erosion of loyalty. Meanwhile, Tommy DeVito, who expects to be "made" into the family, is led to a room under this pretense but is instead shot in the head as retribution for his earlier murder of the made man Billy Batts. This event underscores the mob's unforgiving and inescapable code of justice.

Henry, deeply involved in a side business of trafficking cocaine against Paulie's orders, becomes increasingly erratic and paranoid due to his own drug use and the constant surveillance by narcotics officers. The climax occurs on a single, chaotic day where Henry is trying to manage a drug deal, cook a family dinner, and deal with his drug-mule babysitter, all while being followed by a helicopter. He is ultimately arrested by narcotics agents in his driveway. Abandoned by Paulie and realizing that Jimmy intends to have him killed to silence him as a loose end, Henry is left with no choice. He makes the fateful decision to become an FBI informant, breaking the mob's most sacred code. His testimony in court leads to the conviction and imprisonment of his former mentors, Paulie and Jimmy. The film's final scene shows Henry living a mundane suburban life under the Witness Protection Program. He breaks the fourth wall, speaking directly to the audience, lamenting that he is no longer a powerful gangster but just an "average nobody," a "schnook." The hidden meaning is that for Henry, the loss of his criminal life is the true punishment; he feels no remorse for his crimes, only nostalgia for the power he once wielded.

While the dominant interpretation of GoodFellas is as a cautionary tale and a deconstruction of the gangster myth, some alternative readings exist. One perspective is to view the film through the lens of an unreliable narrator. Since the entire story is told from Henry's point of view, it's possible that he presents himself in a more favorable light than reality. He rarely participates in the most brutal acts of violence and often positions himself as a reluctant observer or the voice of reason. This interpretation suggests that Henry might be minimizing his own culpability and ruthlessness to gain the audience's sympathy, making his character even more complex and morally ambiguous.

Another interpretation focuses on the film as a critique of capitalist ambition and the American Dream. The mobsters can be seen as extreme capitalists who operate outside the law, using violence and exploitation as their business model. Their rise and fall mirror the boom-and-bust cycles of legitimate businesses, and their relentless pursuit of wealth at any human cost reflects the darkest aspects of the capitalist ethos. Henry's final lament is not for his lost morality, but for his exclusion from the game of acquisition, making him a tragic figure of a purely materialistic society.