Skip to content
Leviticus
A tender, dread-soaked Australian horror romance where first love is hunted by the thing it summoned — a monster wearing the face of the boy you cannot stop wanting.
Leviticus

Leviticus

"It will never stop."

17 June 2026 Australia 88 min 6.6 (233)

Director: Adrian Chiarella

Cast: Joe Bird, Stacy Clausen, Mia Wasikowska, Nicholas Hope, Tyallah Bullock

Romance Horror Religious coercion and conversion practices First love as survival Shame, secrecy and the closet The small town as organism Parenthood and imperfect protection
Budget: $3,500,000
Box Office: $8,493,480

Overview

<p><i>Leviticus</i> (2026) is the feature debut of Australian writer-director Adrian Chiarella, a coming-of-age romantic supernatural horror film set in a small, pious Australian industrial town that shares its name with the movie. Naim (Joe Bird) arrives with his mother Arlene (Mia Wasikowska) as an outsider, and finds himself drawn — furtively, then helplessly — to local boy Ryan (Stacy Clausen). Their courtship begins the way so many secret adolescences do: in the places adults have abandoned, including a derelict mill on the edge of town where the film opens.</p><p>What starts as a hushed, hand-held love story curdles when the boys are outed. The local church responds by bringing in a "deliverance healer" to perform a ritual intended to purge the boys of lust. The rite does not fail so much as succeed monstrously: something is called up that shapeshifts into the person each boy desires most — that is, into each other — and it comes for them whenever they are alone.</p><p>Chiarella builds the film on a cruel, elegant premise: the only protection against the creature is the very intimacy the town is trying to destroy. Premiering in the Midnight section of the 2026 Sundance Film Festival and later opening the 55th edition of New Directors/New Films, the film earned positive reviews for its concept and for the chemistry of its two young leads, with several critics noting that it plays as much as a romance as a horror picture.</p>

Core Meaning

<p>Chiarella uses the machinery of supernatural horror to make an argument about where harm actually originates. The monster in <i>Leviticus</i> is not a metaphor for queerness; it is a metaphor for what a community does to queerness. The entity is <strong>summoned by the exorcism, not by the desire</strong> — the ritual meant to cleanse the boys is the thing that endangers them.</p><p>Its cruelest design is that the creature wears the beloved's face. Conversion practices work by teaching a person that their love is a lie, that tenderness is a trap, that the one they want is the danger. The film literalizes that lesson: after the ritual, Naim and Ryan genuinely cannot trust the sight of one another. To survive, they have to relearn the difference between the person and the projection — to choose each other knowingly rather than instinctively.</p><p>The message that emerges is neither sentimental nor nihilistic: love here is not a magic shield, but a discipline of staying close, staying visible, refusing solitude. The film wields horror <strong>in defence of queer love</strong>, insisting that the real terror was always the pious, watchful town that thought it was saving two boys.</p>

Thematic DNA

Religious coercion and conversion practices 30%
First love as survival 25%
Shame, secrecy and the closet 20%
The small town as organism 15%
Parenthood and imperfect protection 10%

Religious coercion and conversion practices

The engine of the plot is a church-sanctioned 'deliverance' ritual performed on two teenagers after they are outed. The film frames faith-based conversion not as misguided kindness but as an act of violence with consequences that outlive the ceremony — the rite is what unleashes the entity, making the town's piety the literal source of the horror.

First love as survival

Naim and Ryan's romance is filmed with the awkward, breathless specificity of adolescence — stolen afternoons in an abandoned mill, a secret shared like contraband. The curse then weaponizes that intimacy, so every act of trust between them becomes a risk and a defiance at once. Critics repeatedly noted the leads' chemistry gives the film a romantic charge stronger than its scares.

Shame, secrecy and the closet

Ryan is closeted and local; Naim is a newcomer with less to lose in town but everything to lose in Ryan. The entity attacks only when a boy is alone, turning isolation — the closet's defining condition — into the actual mechanism of death.

The small town as organism

Leviticus is an industrial community with a collective moral immune system: rumour, church authority, the pressure of being watched. The film treats the town less as a setting than as an antagonist that acts through its residents, which is why the ending locates the true threat in the community rather than the creature.

Parenthood and imperfect protection

Arlene, Naim's mother, embodies the limits of an adult's ability to shield a child from a place's beliefs. Wasikowska plays her as a woman negotiating a town whose rules she did not write, raising the question of whether well-meaning love is enough when the surrounding order is hostile.

Character Analysis

Naim

Joe Bird

Archetype: Outsider hero / newcomer Key Trait: Watchful tenderness

Motivation

To be with Ryan without having to disappear to do it — and, once the ritual backfires, to keep them both alive.

Character Arc

Arrives in Leviticus as a stranger with his mother, falls furtively in love with Ryan, and is dragged from private happiness into public exposure and supernatural siege. His arc moves from concealment to a form of active resistance: by the finale he is the one who confronts the entity and its logic rather than hiding from it.

Ryan

Stacy Clausen

Archetype: Closeted beloved Key Trait: Guarded warmth

Motivation

Belonging — first to the town that raised him, and finally to Naim, when he accepts he cannot have both.

Character Arc

As a local boy embedded in the town's church and social order, Ryan has far more to lose than Naim and begins the film managing his own erasure. Being outed strips away his cover, and the curse forces him to decide whether to keep protecting his standing or commit fully to the person he wants.

All 3 characters and cast

Symbols & Motifs

The abandoned mill

Meaning:

The ruin of the town's industrial purpose becomes the only free territory the boys have — a space outside adult supervision where desire is permitted precisely because the place has been given up on.

Context:

The film opens with Naim and Ryan breaking into the derelict mill, establishing trespass as the grammar of their romance: to be together they must go where they are not allowed.

The shapeshifting entity

Meaning:

The internalized voice of conversion doctrine given a body. It insists that what you desire is what will destroy you, and it can only be defeated by refusing that premise.

Context:

Summoned by the deliverance ritual, it takes the form of the person each boy desires most — each other — and strikes only when they are separated.

The deliverance ritual

Meaning:

A symbol of the violence of 'cure': a ceremony that claims to remove something from a person and instead adds something monstrous to their world.

Context:

Performed by a healer brought in by the local church after the boys are outed; its backfiring is the film's inciting supernatural event.

The town's name

Meaning:

Naming the town after the biblical book most frequently cited to condemn homosexuality turns geography into scripture — the boys are not just living under a doctrine, they are living inside its name.

Context:

The title functions simultaneously as place, verdict and joke: to leave Leviticus is to leave the text that condemns you.

The departing bus

Meaning:

Escape as a physical act rather than a spiritual one — salvation is measured in distance from the community, not in absolution.

Context:

The final scene places Naim and Ryan on a bus pulling away from town, the closest thing the film offers to deliverance.

The window / the double

Meaning:

The impossibility of ever fully trusting perception again after being taught to doubt your own heart; also the ghost of the town that will keep travelling with them.

Context:

In the last shot, Naim sees what looks like Ryan standing outside the bus window while Ryan sits beside him.

Philosophical Questions

Can love be a form of protection, or only a form of exposure?

The curse makes intimacy simultaneously the boys' only defence — the entity strikes when they are alone — and the reason they are targeted at all. The film refuses to resolve this into a slogan, presenting closeness as something that must be actively maintained rather than something that saves you automatically.

What is the moral status of harm committed in good faith?

The church and the deliverance healer believe they are rescuing two boys. The film's supernatural logic is a judgment on that belief: sincerity does not neutralize the damage, and the ritual's monstrous result is treated as the honest consequence of what the intention already was.

If you are taught to distrust your own desire, how would you ever know what is real?

By making the monster indistinguishable from the beloved, the film puts its characters in an epistemological trap: every perception of the other person becomes suspect. Survival requires developing a knowledge of the beloved that is deeper than sight — recognition instead of appearance.

Is escape the same thing as freedom?

The finale offers a bus out of town, but also a figure at the window. The film asks whether leaving a place removes what the place put inside you, and it declines to promise that it does.

How It Ends

Alternative Interpretations

<p><strong>The literal reading.</strong> The ritual genuinely conjures a supernatural predator; the film is a monster movie in which two boys must survive a demon that hunts them in the shape of their beloved. The final glimpse of a second Ryan outside the bus window means the entity survived and has followed them — an unresolved threat rather than a defeated one.</p><p&...

Full ending explanation

Cultural Impact

<p><i>Leviticus</i> arrived as part of a now-substantial wave of queer horror that uses genre to dramatize institutional harm rather than to pathologize desire. Its specific target — faith-based conversion practices, still legislatively contested in Australia state by state — gives the film a documentary anger underneath its supernatural premise, and Chiarella has framed the film's "real terror" in interviews as the human machinery of the church and town rather than the creature.</p><p>The festival trajectory shaped its reputation: a Sundance Midnight premiere positioned it as a genre discovery, while being chosen to open New Directors/New Films at Film at Lincoln Center and MoMA reframed it as a significant art-house debut. That double life — midnight-movie and curated-debut — is exactly the film's register, and critics responded to it as such, praising the premise and the performances, with several noting that the leads' chemistry tips the film toward romance more than horror.</p><p>Culturally, the title does a lot of work on its own. By naming an Australian industrial town after the biblical book most often quoted to condemn homosexuality, the film absorbs a long history of scriptural weaponization and hands it back as a place you can, in principle, board a bus and leave. For Mia Wasikowska, the film also marked a notable move into producing, lending an established name to a first-time director's queer genre debut.</p>

Audience Reception

<p><strong>Overall:</strong> the film opened to positive reviews from critics following its Sundance Midnight premiere and its Australian theatrical release on 18 June 2026, and it holds a 7.2 user rating on IMDb.</p><p><strong>Most praised:</strong> the premise — a conversion ritual that summons a monster wearing the beloved's face — was widely singled out as a genuinely inventive piece of horror architecture. The performances of Joe Bird and Stacy Clausen drew consistent praise, with reviewers noting that their chemistry brings "an elevated energy" to the concept. Critics also credited Chiarella for using horror in defence of queer love while avoiding easy sentimentalism and refusing to collapse into hopelessness.</p><p><strong>Points of friction:</strong> the most common qualification is one of balance — that the film ultimately reads as more romantic than horrific, which delighted viewers who came for the love story and left some midnight-audience genre fans wanting harder scares. The deliberately ambiguous final image has also been a lightning rod, generating a steady stream of "is Ryan alive / did they really escape" explainers and debate.</p><p><strong>Verdict:</strong> a well-received debut that lands as an emotionally serious queer coming-of-age film first and a creature feature second, with its unease drawn less from the monster than from the town that called it up.</p>

Interesting Facts

  • Leviticus is the feature directorial debut of Australian filmmaker Adrian Chiarella, who also wrote the screenplay.
  • Mia Wasikowska both stars in the film, as Naim's mother Arlene, and serves as an executive producer.
  • The film world-premiered in the Midnight section of the 2026 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January 2026.
  • It was selected as the opening night film of the 55th edition of New Directors/New Films, presented by Film at Lincoln Center and the Museum of Modern Art, which ran 8–19 April 2026.
  • The film was released theatrically in Australia on 18 June 2026, to positive reviews from critics.
  • Chiarella and leads Joe Bird and Stacy Clausen appeared together in a New Directors/New Films conversation moderated by selection committee member Madeline Whittle.
  • The film also screened at the Phoenix Film Festival, where its creative team gave a joint festival interview.
  • The cast includes Jeremy Blewitt alongside Joe Bird, Stacy Clausen and Mia Wasikowska.
  • IMDb classifies the film under Horror, Romance and Sci-Fi, where it carries a 7.2 user rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore More About This Movie

Dive deeper into specific aspects of the movie with our detailed analysis pages

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Similar Movies